
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — A Minnesota jury awarded $65.5 million on Friday to a mother of three who claimed talcum products made by Johnson & Johnson exposed her to asbestos and contributed to her developing cancer in the lining of her lungs.
Jurors determined that plaintiff Anna Jean Houghton Carley, 37, should be compensated by Johnson & Johnson after using its baby powder throughout her childhood and later developing mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer caused primarily by exposure to the carcinogen asbestos.
Johnson & Johnson said it would appeal the verdict.
During a 13-day trial in Ramsey County District Court, Carley's legal team argued the pharmaceutical giant sold and marketed talc-based products to consumers despite knowing it can be contaminated with asbestos. Carley's lawyers also said her family was never warned about potential dangers while using the product on their child. The product was taken off shelves in the U.S. in 2020.
“This case was not about compensation only. It was about truth and accountability," Carley's attorney Ben Braly said.
Erik Haas, worldwide vice president of litigation for Johnson & Johnson, argued the company's baby powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer. He expects an appellate court to reverse the decision.
The verdict is the latest development in a longstanding legal battle over claims that talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower body powder was connected to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, which strikes the lungs and other organs. Johnson & Johnson stopped selling powder made with talc worldwide in 2023.
“These lawsuits are predicated on ‘junk science,’ refuted by decades of studies that demonstrate Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer,” Haas said in a statement after the verdict.
Earlier this month, a Los Angeles jury awarded $40 million to two women who claimed Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused their ovarian cancer. And in October, another California jury ordered the company to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died of mesothelioma, claiming she developed the cancer because the baby powder she used was contaminated with asbestos.
LATEST POSTS
- 1
How did Hugh Jackman nail his latest role? Sequins, tighty-whities and embracing 'zero embarrassment.' - 2
Compassion and Association: Building Significant Connections - 3
Italian court approves extradition to Germany of Ukrainian suspect in Nord Stream pipeline blast - 4
Iran's stolen futures: The arrested Iranians at risk of execution by the regime - 5
Tehran defends ship seizure as a legal action, but tensions continue in the Gulf
What to watch for in weight loss drugs in 2026
Behind every perfect holiday memory is a mom on the brink
Instructions to Warmly greet Discretion and Thoughtfulness
Miley Cyrus flashes a diamond ring on the red carpet, sparking engagement rumors with Maxx Morando: A timeline of their four-year relationship
Figure out How to Streamline Eco-friendliness in Your Volvo XC40
Soldiers seize power in Guinea-Bissau and detain the president
Multi-million-euro win in Spanish lottery in doubt due to oversight
Beating Wellbeing Difficulties: Individual Victories in Health
The most effective method to Apply Antiquated Ways of thinking in Current Brain science Practices











